|
|
||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
|
Bloomberg, spurned by WFP, now ducks on paid sick leave |
|||||||||
|
August 25, 2009 | New York Daily News Remember last month when Mayor Bloomberg, angling for the endorsement of the Working Families Party, told a party gathering that he supported paid sick leave for large employers? The party instead endorsed Controller William Thompson, who supports paid sick leave for every worker in New York, regardless of the size of their company. This is becoming a litmus-test issue for progressive groups in New York, after the Drum Major Institute released a report saying 1 million New Yorkers can't take a paid day off if they get sick -- which the group says increases the risk of spreading swine flu this fall. Earlier this month, 35 Council members introduced a bill requiring paid sick leave for all workers -- but Council Speaker Christine Quinn has declined to take a stand on it. Neither did Bloomberg today. Asked at an unrelated event whether he supports paid sick leave, in light of a report that 90,000 Americans could die of swine flu, he ducked the question twice:
Q: "There's a report that up to 90,000 Americans will die of swine flu this fall and winter. Does this increase the pressure to pass a paid sick leave bill in New York City?" UPDATE: Bloomberg press secretary Stu Loeser angrily insists the mayor is not backing away from support for paid sick leave. While Bloomberg does not believe swine flu is a reason to implement paid sick leave, Loeser said, he will work with the City Council to find a plan he can support. “He is not walking this back one bit,” Loeser said. “He supports
(paid sick leave for) big companies, and has questions about small
companies. The question is, what is a big company?" Adam Lisberg August 25, 2009
Adam Lisberg |
||||||||||